Tag Archives: credit clearing

Can Payments Be Made Without Using Government Fiat Currencies? Yes, but it’s not Bitcoin.

It has long been my position that a real alternative to fiat money as a means of payment requires reclaiming the “credit commons,” i.e. establishing community control over credit. It is producers and sellers of real value who are the ones who are actually qualified to issue a currency into circulation. They can do so individually by using their own private voucher currencies redeemable for the goods and services they are ready, willing, and able to provide, or they can do it in cooperation with others by pooling their commitments and jointly issuing a common voucher currency. Such a currency can then circulate generally for other to use to pay one another instead of using dollars. Euros, pounds, or other government fiat currencies.

My paper titled, Invoice Factoring as the Basis for a Digital Token Currency, presented at the RAMICS Conference in Rome on November 6, 2024, describes how that can be achieved by creating a digital token currency that, unlike present-day crypto currencies, is based on, and redeemable for real goods and services. This presentation describes the structure, processes, and protocols for creating and circulating a digital voucher token currency on a continuous recurrent basis. I’ve summarized my proposal in this 12-minute video posted on YouTube.

And you can read the full paper, here.

Now published: Chapter 16—The Role of Credit Clearing in Regional Economic Development

Chapter 16 is the latest Chapter in my new updated and expanded edition of The End of Money and the Future of Civilization. The link to this chapter is now listed along with the other previously published chapters on the book page along with links to the audio narrations by Ken Richings. Scroll down to find Chapter 16 there or click here to go directly to the PDF file.

Here are the Chapter contents:

Figure 16.1 A Typical Small Boat Harbor (Drawing by Dennis Pacheco)
  • The Orthodox Approach to Community Economic Development
  • A Comprehensive Community Economic Development Plan
  • Stage I: Map the Local Actors and Assets & Promote Import Substitution
  • Stage II: Support Structures for Localization—Saving, Investment, Finance, and Education
  • Stage III: New Liquidity Through TrustMutual Credit as a Way to Pay
    How It Works
    Key Benefits
    The Generation and Allocation of Trade Credits
  • Stage IV: The Credit of “Trusted Issuers” Can Provide a Local Alternative Currency for General Circulation
  • Stage V and Beyond: Transition to an Objective Measure of Value and Unit of Account

As always, your comments are welcome.

Can the BRICS escape the orbit of the Western Empire?

If the BRICS ever hope to escape the orbit and dominance of the Western Empire they will need to organize an international clearing Union under their own control, along the lines of the Bancor proposal of John Maynard Keynes which he put forth in 1944 at the Bretton Woods conference. If that proposal had been adopted it might have saved the world 80 years of grief and violent conflict.

Further pertinent information from Alistaire Crooke

The usefulness of AI as a tool for learning

Today, out of curiosity, I asked Copilot this question:

“How would E. C. Riegel organize the exchange of value among producers and intermediaries in the distribution process?”

Here is Copilots’ surprisingly accurate response to that question. It is, in effect, a brief summary of his book Private Enterprise Money.

E. C. Riegel envisioned a radically decentralized and voluntary system of value exchange that bypassed both government-issued money and centralized banking. His proposed framework, known as the Valun Exchange System, was designed to empower producers and intermediaries to coordinate trade through a self-regulated, non-political monetary mechanism.

Here’s how it would work in practice:

1. Voluntary Association of Producers: Producers and intermediaries would form a cooperative network called a Valun Exchange. Membership would be voluntary and based on mutual trust and creditworthiness.

2. Private Credit as Currency: Instead of using state-issued money, members would issue credit to one another in the form of Valun units. These units would be backed by the members’ productive capacity and promises to deliver goods or services—not by gold, fiat, or government decree.

3. Accounts, Not Cash: Transactions would be recorded as debits and credits in members’ accounts, similar to a mutual credit system. No physical currency would be needed; the system would operate through bookkeeping entries.

4. Intermediaries as Facilitators: Distributors, wholesalers, and retailers would participate as both buyers and sellers, using their Valun accounts to settle transactions. Their role would be to facilitate the flow of goods, not to extract value through speculative finance.

5. Self-Limiting Credit: A member’s ability to issue credit would be limited by their past performance and the confidence of the network. This would prevent inflation and ensure that credit was grounded in real economic activity.

6. No Interest, No Taxes: Since the system was private and voluntary, it would not involve interest-bearing loans or taxation. Riegel believed this would eliminate many distortions in the traditional monetary system.

In essence, Riegel’s model treated money not as a commodity or a government tool, but as a social contract among producers—a means of measuring and facilitating exchange based on trust and productivity. It was a bold attempt to return the power of money creation to the people actually producing value.

If you’d like, I can sketch out a visual flow of how this system would operate among producers, intermediaries, and consumers.

To that offer, I answered, “yes,” but in successive attempts Copilot failed to produce an accurate flow diagram. I have for many years been using my own diagram of credit flows in mutual credit clearing systems. Here it is below. If you substitute the word “valun” for “Currency vouchers,” this diagram shows exactly what Riegel was describing:

The “Trusted Producer” depicted in the upper right begins the process by using their line of credit to purchase something for an employee, supplier or contractor. Those credit vouchers then flow in the numbered sequence, the final step being when the Trusted Issuer accepts them back in payment for the goods or services they sell, thus completing the circuit of reciprocity. Note that at each step of the way, goods and services are circulating in the opposite direction to the voucher credits (or valuns).

I then pointed out to Copilot that it had failed to specify the units in which valun credits were to be denominated. This was its response:

Great point, Thomas. Riegel proposed that all debits and credits in his system would be denominated in a unit called the Valun—short for “value unit”. This was not just a name, but a deliberate attempt to establish a new standard of value independent of national currencies and political influence.

At the system’s launch, the Valun was intended to be roughly equivalent in purchasing power to the U.S. dollar, simply to ease adoption and pricing familiarity. However, over time, its value would be maintained internally by the productivity and trustworthiness of the network’s members, not by fiat or commodity backing.

So, in essence, every transaction—whether between producers, intermediaries, or consumers—would be recorded in Valuns, making it a closed-loop accounting system grounded in mutual credit and real economic activity.

Would you like a breakdown of how Valun pricing might work in practice, or how it could be stabilized over time?

I already knew how Riegel proposed to stabilize the Valun pricing unit, and I am not satisfied with it being adequate. I make my case in a document which Copilot cited as a source; it is contained in a previous post to my website, E. C. Riegel’s Valun Mutual Money Plan, but the reference was to a site other than my own. It would be better to read the original post on my site. That post contains the full text of the Valun Mutual Money Plan, together with my comments and critique. I believe that serious students would do well to read it.

Now published: Chapter 15—Commercial Trade Exchanges—Their Present Limitations and Promising Future-Text

Chapter 15 is the latest Chapter in my new updated and expanded edition of The End of Money and the Future of Civilization. The link to this chapter is now listed along with the other previously published chapters on the book page along with links to the audio narrations by Ken Richings. Scroll down to find Chapter 15 there or click here to go directly to the PDF file.

Here are the Chapter contents:

  • Limiting Factors
    • Limited Scope and Scale
    • The Value Proposition
    • Operations and Agreements
    • Proposed Remedies
    • Credit Allocation Criteria
  • Tapping the Vast Potential Market
  • What About Taxes?
  • The Story of Sardex
  • An Eventual Moneyless Trading Network

As always, your comments are welcome.

My latest interview on Primo Radical.

Now published, Chapter 11—Credit Clearing, the “UnMoney”

This is the latest chapter to be published of my new 2024 edition of The End of Money and the Future of Civilization. It continues the story about “credit clearing” that was begun in the previous chapter and shows how it will revolutionize trade and payments and make money, as we have known it, obsolete.  

Here is a brief excerpt:

If there were no money, any system of crediting sellers and debiting buyers would be fully competent to accomplish the work now performed by money. – Hugo Bilgram, 1914

In Chapter 10 we explained that the highest stage in the evolution of reciprocal exchange is “credit clearing,” and that banks have been using it for the past few hundred years to settle obligations amongst themselves.  In this chapter we will further describe the history and applications of credit clearing, and we will show how clearing can be used to offset claims among not only groups of banks, but also among any persons or entities that have financial claims against one another. Most significantly, it is a process that may be applied among buyers and sellers of goods and services to directly offset their respective claims without involving banks as middle-men and without the need for conventional bank- or government-created currencies.

Direct Clearing Among Buyers and Sellers

Credit clearing is actually an ancient process. During the Middle Ages, credit played a major role in the various European “market towns” which hosted, at regular intervals, trading fairs in which merchants from widely scattered areas would gather to trade their goods. It is reasonable to conclude that the process of credit clearing would have been fundamental in their trading activities. This is evidenced by the fact that these market towns typically provided market courts for settling disputes under “merchant law” that was separate from common law and could be adjudicated in a matter of hours or days. James Davis points out that, “At the pettiest level of sales credit, many traders appear to have acted both as creditors and debtors, and there is evidence for running accounts, reciprocal dealings and a ‘complex of claims and counterclaims,’” and that, “Credit oiled the wheels of trade, and market courts dealt in small-scale sales debts that were integral to local retail and wholesale commerce. A market court ostensibly lowered transaction costs and thus attracted more traders by aiding a perception of the market as ‘fair, affordable, efficient’”. 

The possibilities of direct credit clearing among buyers and sellers have long been recognized. In modern times, as early as 1914, Hugo Bilgram and L. E. Levy noted that, “If there were no money, any system of crediting sellers and debiting buyers would be fully competent to accomplish the work now performed by money.”  They further suggested that:

“Were a number of businessmen to combine for the purpose of organizing a system of exchange, effective among themselves, they could clearly demonstrate how simple the money system can really be made. The greater the number of businessmen that would thus cooperate, the more complete would be their own emancipation from the obstruction to commerce and industry which existing currency laws impose.”

They then went on to propose such a system and describe how it might operate, which I summarized in one of my previous books and in a website post.  I’ll not repeat that here because the context today is much different from what it was in 1914, but we will present a similar proposal based on what has since been learned and tailored to our current realities. I believe that it is no exaggeration to say that the creation and operation of such credit clearing systems is crucial to reversing the present trend toward economic ruin and global tyranny and changing the course toward realizing our human potential and the emergence of a peaceful, convivial civilization in which all can thrive.

You can read or listen to the entire chapter here.