This is the sorry state of affairs in today’s world. George Orwell had it right; you can’t defy Big Brother without facing dire consequences. The following article by Daniel McAdams of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity describes what is happening to Julian Assange at the hands of the global empire and what the ultimate outcome is likely to be.
Hunting
Assange
Dear Friends of the Ron Paul Institute:
As US
Constitutional scholar and George Washington University Law School professor
Jonathan Turley wrote this week, the US Attorney General is completely
wrong in his efforts to prosecute Wikileaks publisher Julian Assange under the
Espionage Act. “The use of the Espionage Act strikes at the heart of
the First Amendment,” wrote Turley, who noted with approval that several
prosecutors in the Attorney General’s office shared his view that the
indictment of Assange on espionage charges is a terrible idea.
RPI Board Member Judge Andrew Napolitano hits the nail squarely on the
head:
Why was Assange indicted? Government killers are a mob, and mobs love anonymity. Assange assaulted their love by ending that anonymity. When the government kills and rejoices and lies about it in our names, we have a right to know of its behavior. Democracies spy on us all, yet they persist in punishing, to the ends of the earth, those who dare to shine a light upon them. Tyrannies do the same.
Amen, Judge!
What Assange has done – published leaked information undoubtedly in the public interest regarding probable criminal activities by the US government – is virtually indistinguishable from what mainstream media outlets do on a regular basis. In fact, if Assange is to be imprisoned as the publisher of information given him by NSA whistleblower Chelsea Manning, what’s to stop the publishers of the New York Times and Washington Post from being prosecuted for printing the exact same information?
If it becomes criminal to expose the criminality of our own government, then our days as a self-governing society are well and truly gone. We all become subjects to an authoritarian “deep state” rather than citizens of a republic of constitutionally limited state authority.
And that doesn’t even scratch the surface of the idiocy of pursuing Assange for the “crime” of journalism. How does it make any sense that Julian Assange – an Australian – is being charged with treason against the United States, to which he owes no allegiance nor has he signed any form of non-disclosure agreement?
The US government may believe that it runs the world through its global military empire, but the assumption that non-Americans operating outside of the United States are to be subject to US laws regulating freedom of the press is to open a Pandora’s box that cannot end well.
Should American journalists operating in Europe, for example, be expected to adhere to China’s legal press regulation framework? Should the publisher of the Washington Post bone up on the Iranian legal system lest he be nabbed in the street somewhere in violation of Tehran’s media laws?
But what if Attorney General Barr and all the rest of the “permanent state” or “national security state” or whatever we choose to call it already knows that prosecuting Assange is going to be a wrenching and possibly ultimately futile endeavor? What if the goal is not to make him disappear in a supermax prison for the rest of his life but to actually just make him…disappear?
We have learned through Assange’s attorneys this week that he is so sick he cannot even have a normal conversation. He is reportedly “gravely ill” and has been moved to the hospital ward at the UK’s gulag-like Belmarsh prison. What if Assange is getting the “Milosevic treatment” – held in appalling conditions waiting for a judicial decision while being denied adequate medical treatment and in the end passing away before the case falls apart.
That’s just what happened to Miloevic at the Hague. He was held in inhuman conditions for years while they prepared his trial. He did not receive needed medical care and in the end he died before his trial – a trial which he was eventually exonerated.
So in the end it did not matter that the authorities could not prove their case. The case was closed. Permanently.
How could a dead Assange possibly help the national security statists in their efforts to keep us supine subjects, never questioning endless war and encroachment on our civil liberties? Because after Assange is dispensed with, who is going to take any risks to expose the crimes committed in our names and with our money? As I said in today’s Liberty Report, we will only be left with the mainstream media state stenographers, whose publication of national security leaks mostly consists of bolstering or hampering rivals inside the deep state apparatus. Rarely if ever do they actually expose the deep state for what it is – a murderous, lying, authoritarian mob that seeks total control over all of us.
That is why Assange in a recent handwritten note urged others to continue his work exposing such evil. “Everyone else must take my place,” he pleaded. But when the state has his ruined body on display, who would dare step up?
That is how they win. And we cannot let that happen. We must all do what we can to draw attention to the plight of Assange and the attack on our freedom of information. Our future and the future of coming generations depends on it!
Source: https://mailchi.mp/ronpaulinstitute/is-war-popular-rpi-19th-april-update-114409?e=01487c06b3
Tom, Terrible, but expected. Power Corrupts. If we had detailed records of events happening in any organization where power rules, we would discover long lists of horrendous actions. These get buried from official histories. Our nation is an arch criminal, and has been so from the beginning. The polarization now in the USA has two “evil” systems at war; the GOP/Trump front is engaging a slow coup over the US Constitutional System, which is so antiquated it has crumbled/warped. In a new style game, without rules, those on “the other side” act as if they are unaware that there are no rules. The2020 election will be rigged. If Trump loses the first count, he will challenge the vote and could rig the recount. If Trump refuses to leave the WH, what force can remove him?
Humans are not intrinsically evil. Humans have vast potentials that manifest when engaging their environment. We are molded, by chance and our successive environments. When environments are supportive, individual human agency can play. Environments in civilizations are designed to suppress human development of the masses. Many end up living in their private wrlds where it is OK to do what others view as “evil”. Trump is but an extreme of this.
Trump is not running the show. Trump is a very mentally odd man. Trump totally equates his subjective wrld with objective reality. Donald is a “stable genius” in his wrld. The “nature of things” are only what he has constructed from his very limited knowledge, including many “fake facts from FOX” which he believes true. Trump probably has a poor memory and is unaware when he contradicts himself. He, and from his father, have a viable process for hacking the economic system to serve their egos. Trump lives day-by-day, playing in his wrld. As POTUS he can play on the global stage, visiting national leaders. He bungles these encounters, and can be manipulated. No one tells him what to do, except his “handlers”. Who they are and how Trump perceives them, in his wrld remains a challenge for me.
LikeLike